
DesignWA - Proposed Changes to Multi-unit Housing Code: Introducing SPP 7 - Design of the Built Environment
The Department of Planning yesterday released a draft suite of documents aimed at elevating the role of design in delivering quality developments, in particular, multiple dwellings and mixed use developments. The collection of draft documents includes SPP 7 — design of the built environment. As part of Design WA, this draft policy will replace part 6 of the Residential Design Codes WA (R-Codes) which specifically relates to multiple dwelling developments.
Hemsley Planning has undertaken a cursory analysis of some of the proposed changes with a focus on the introduction and modification of primary controls impacting site planning and design.
Comments on the draft Design WA set of policies can be made via https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/publications/designwa.asp
Submissions close 5pm, Tuesday 20 December 2016.
Creation of Two Overarching R-Code Categories for R40+
|
|
Response |
We understand there will be a requirement for Scheme amendments or the introduction of other local planning framework required to introduce or identify attached streetscape pattern designated areas. We have identified this as a possible barrier to implementation. Hemsley Planning highly encourages the Department of Planning to introduce standardised template with which Local Governments must use to publish and assist with developing site-specific planning controls. Part 2.2 is suggesting the introduction of Local Development Plans (LDP) to implement detailed controls. We support this and would recommend encouraging private landowners to pursue implementing LDP's themselves. |
Setbacks & Building Separation |
|
Response | It appears that these controls are designed to incentivise developers amalgamating sites. Due to the costly and difficult nature of amalgamating sites, we believe there should be greater incentive provided for those securing the amalgamation of sites. |
Introduction of Incentive-Based Development Standards |
|
Response |
We support the clarity and consistency that this will achieve in preparing advice and preparing development applications. |
Heights |
|
Response |
The primary controls are focusing on achieving greater open space through increased setbacks, allowing increased height as a tradeoff, provided a range of other requirements are met is a natural response to assist in maintaining yield which we support. We believe a focus on storeys over metres as a building height controls will result in more liveable spaces with improved internal ceiling heights. |
Plot Ratio |
|
Response |
We support the improved clarity and the effective incorporation of the 'explanatory guidelines' into the relevant sections of the draft policy. |
Introduction of Building Depth Control |
|
Response | We feel it should be a requirement relative to the depth of a lot. Not applicable to parking areas and lower podium levels. The misinterpretation of this provision may restrict creative and 'out of the box' design solutions which can reduce the bulk and appearance through alternative means. Other proposed controls suitably ensure high-quality living spaces without the requirement to restrict building depth. |
Balcony & Storeroom Dimensions |
|
Response |
We believe this is a logical change and are supportive of this. |
Tags: State Planning Policy, SPP, DesignWA